Security guard testifies in Johnny Depp’s libel lawsuit against Amber Heard

0

The trial of Johnny Depp $50 million defamation lawsuit against ex-wife Amber Heard resumed Monday with testimony from a man who worked as a security guard for Depp. Travis McGivern described arguments overheard between the couple after they returned from a trip to Australia in March 2015, “I wouldn’t say every night, but every other night, several times a week.”

Heard accused Depp of repeatedly physically and sexually assaulting her before and during their brief marriage. He then sued her for defamation after she wrote a 2018 op-ed in The Washington Post in which she called herself a “public figure representing domestic violence.”

She never mentioned Depp by name in the op-ed, but her lawyers argued it was a clear reference to the charges Heard brought in 2016 when she sought a restraining order against him.

In Monday’s testimony, McGivern said he witnessed “a lot of name-calling, F-bombing”, which he said usually came from “Miss Heard, directing her feelings towards Mr. Depp”. He also described an argument in which “I saw Miss Heard throw a can of Red Bull from her position which hit Mr Depp in the back”.

US-TRIBUNAL-DEPP-HEARD
Travis McGivern, a security guard for Johnny Depp, is seen on video monitors as he testifies remotely in the courtroom in Fairfax, Virginia on May 2, 2022, in Depp’s libel trial against ex-wife Amber Heard.

STEVE HELBER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images


“At that point, I got closer to Mr. Depp,” he said. “I didn’t care that I was in the middle of their conversation at the time. I didn’t want my client to be hit by anything else, so I stood right next to Mr. Depp. The Verbal assault continued from both of them. Mr. Depp was giving his all at the time. He was angry and agitated. At one point, Miss Heard threw something else, a bag hand, either some kind of bag or something she had up there. I was able to hit him so he wouldn’t touch it. At one point, she spat on him.

Last week, jurors heard about the editorial at the center of the case. Terence Dougherty, general counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), said Thursday that the group wrote the article under Heard’s name, reflecting her role as the ACLU’s ambassador on gender-based violence issues.

On Monday, Depp’s agent Jack Whigham testified that the op-ed was different from other articles because it was a “first-person account from the victim.”

“It was extremely impactful,” he added, calling it “catastrophic” for Depp’s career.

Heard’s lawyer, Elaine Bredehoft, aggressively pushed back against the agent’s claim during cross-examination, suggesting the article was inconsequential amid a barrage of bad publicity for Depp.

Depp maintained the accusations and the article contributed to an unjustly ruined reputation that made him a Hollywood pariah and cost him his role in the lucrative “Pirates of the Caribbean” movie franchise.

He testified that he was removed from the franchise just days after the Post article aired. During cross-examination, Heard’s attorney pointed to evidence that Disney made this decision months before the article was published.

Depp filed a lawsuit in Fairfax County Circuit Court in Virginia after the article was published. In four days of testimony in April, he said he had never hit Heard and he had never hit a woman. He accused Heard of physical and emotional abuse, and she filed a $100 million countersuit against him.

The ACLU’s Dougherty testified that numerous attorneys for the organization reviewed the article at various stages and asked Heard’s lawyers to also review the article to make sure it didn’t go wrong. against a nondisclosure agreement she made with Depp as part of the couple’s 2016 divorce.

Depp heard the trial
Amber Heard speaks to her attorney in the courtroom of Fairfax County Circuit Court in Fairfax, Virginia on May 2, 2022.

Steve Helber/AP


During those discussions, Heard returned an edited version approved by his attorneys that “specifically castrated much of the copy relating to his marriage,” according to an email from Jessica Weitz, an ACLU staffer who coordinated with Heard.

According to the email, however, Heard was looking for a way to restore a deleted passage in the article.

The various draft articles were not shown to the jury, so it is unclear how many personal details were in the first draft and how many Heard’s attorneys had edited out.

But the final version contains very little about Heard’s personal experiences. He doesn’t mention Depp at all. In addition to the passage on “a public figure representing domestic violence”, in another passage she writes: “I had the rare perspective of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of violence” .

Much of the article discusses legislative priorities for domestic violence prevention advocates. Other passages refer to parts of his personal life unrelated to Depp.

Dougherty testified that “the language that ended up in the final opinion piece was very different from the original language” in the draft, Dougherty said. “It did not directly refer to Ms. Heard’s relationship with Johnny Depp.”

While the lawsuit is supposed to be about whether Depp was defamed in the article, very little testimony in the first three weeks, until Thursday, has focused on the article itself or its content. . Heard’s attorneys predicted early in the trial that it would become a soap opera that would delve into the messy details of Depp and Heard’s personal lives.

Heard’s lawyers, however, said that even if the jury were to believe she was never abused by Depp, Heard should still prevail in the lawsuit because the article does not concern Depp, does not defame him. not and that Heard’s free speech rights allow her to weigh in on issues of public importance like domestic violence.

Much of Dougherty’s testimony also focused on whether Heard kept his promise to donate $3.5 million — half of his $7 million divorce settlement with Depp — to the ACLU. Dougherty testified that the ACLU so far awards her a contribution of $1.3 million and expects the money to come over a 10-year period, but that she has not made any contributions. since 2018.

Jurors also heard briefly from Depp’s business manager, Ed White. White said he stepped in in 2016 to resolve Depp’s financial difficulties, including unpaid taxes and a cash flow crisis. When he blamed Heard for an excessive wine bill that included several $500 bottles of Spanish Vega Sicilia wine, Heard’s attorneys responded with a barrage of questions about Depp’s overspending, including spending millions on firing the ashes of reporter Hunter S. Thompson from a cannon. .

Depp and Heard met while filming “The Rum Diary,” an adaptation of a Thompson novel. Depp testified earlier that he and Thompson were friends, and that Depp had in fact found the lost “Rum Diary” manuscript while going through Thompson’s papers.

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.